Monday, May 25, 2009
La Planeta De Los Apes
Out of all of the movies I have seen during the school year (woefully few) this would have to be my favorite. Astonishingly I had not seen Planet before and although I had seen Spaceballs I had never fully understood the ending scene until recently. This has been the first movie I've watched in scool that I have considered renting before it was finished in class. But I digress. The Secular Humanism worldview can be seen mostly in the thoughts that Taylor and the scientists express, that there is no god and that ultimatly man (ape) determine their own future. I find that this will probably be my favorite movie during our festival.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Stranger Then Fiction
Well I don't think that this movie fulfilled my expectations, I thought it would be funnier than it turned out to be. Be that as it may I found the movie to be sufficiently Postmodern. Although I do not remember any specific quotes I do find it interesting that the key message behind the film is that you do not control your own destiny, a key Postmodern concept. Other than that I found the watch to be a very interesting part of the plot especially the ending which, although I should have seen it coming I was not expecting.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
R&G Are Finally Dead
“All plots move deathward” –Don DeLillo
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have finally been sent to their deaths. As the play closed I found myself occupied by one question, is this it? I found the ending of the play to be rather anti-climatic and not at all what I had expected. I had thouight that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would be hung, especiall after the player’s lamentations over his last botched execution. Instead the two merely disappear, and it is later discovered that they are dead. Throught the play, the only thing that they really knew was that they would eventually die.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have finally been sent to their deaths. As the play closed I found myself occupied by one question, is this it? I found the ending of the play to be rather anti-climatic and not at all what I had expected. I had thouight that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would be hung, especiall after the player’s lamentations over his last botched execution. Instead the two merely disappear, and it is later discovered that they are dead. Throught the play, the only thing that they really knew was that they would eventually die.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Who Won?
In order to determine who won it is necessary to define the term “winner.” Is it the team that won the most points? Or is it the team that tried the hardest and gave the best answers? A traditional definition of the term would involve both or either of these two requirements. However, in light of the game’s postmodernism I believe that there were no winners. No matter how one tries to define the term “winner” it will still be a “thing” and that “thing” can very well be applied to every person that participated in the game. (Thank you Toast) This demonstrates that words have no meaning save that which we give them, and as "winner" remains undefined in game terms there can not be one.
My own personal belief outside of the assignment is that the Tails team won because we had more points.
My own personal belief outside of the assignment is that the Tails team won because we had more points.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
R & G Are Living...for the moment
As we finish Act II of R&G Are Dead I find myself less confused then I was at the beginning of the Act. Luckily, I've managed to finally accept the seemingly random scene changes. Although as I have been reading the play I find myself wondering whether the average reader understands what is truly occurring within. I wonder if anyone that does not analyze the play can truly appreciate it for anything more then a well written parody of Hamlet. Obviously if they have read Hamlet then the meta fiction would stand out, but would any of the postmodern ideas and concepts? This question will probably continue to bug me until I can convince someone not in our class to read both Hamlet and R&G and then give me their opinion on it...an unlikely prospect if there every was one.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Rhetoric
I found Obama's inaugural address to be OK, but certainly not on the level of others such as John F. Kennedy's of 1960. I felt that as for the speaking of the address is was good. however the composition of it was not. I do like how he referenced the need for continuing responsibility, but he made no mention of personal responsibility. A major loss in my opinion. My other concern with the inauguration is the benediction given by the Reverend Lowery. Although the article glosses over his benediction his closing prayer included "when white will embrace what is right." If we had not already accepted this then how would Barack be the President? I find the current trend of double standards in this country to be worrying. I thought that in 'post-racial' America we would be beyond taking cheap shots at each other while giving speeches. I am disappointed that Obama allowed this to happen.
Sources:
http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres56.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4SrWpZNd-yocKSO7_9FO51iLJowD95R4RTG0
Sources:
http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres56.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4SrWpZNd-yocKSO7_9FO51iLJowD95R4RTG0
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
R & G Are Still Dead
After having read Act I I am now completely confused by the idea of a play within a play within a play. This is going to be a concept that will require further thought, but I don't think logic is going to be much of a help. Rosencrantz continues to be my favorite character, even if he can be a bit slow at times. This tends to be what makes him funny. As it stands now, I'm enjoying the play and am excited to see what happens now that Hamlet has been introduced.
To Be Revised
To Be Revised
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)